# Light Sleep

- Candidate: Session: 2026-05-25 11:01:07 GMT+8: **Session Key**: agent:val:telegram:direct:8745444509; **Session ID**: d80223cb-b510-45e5-94c2-195f92ddbefe; **Source**: telegram
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:3-5
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:9-9
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "chat_id": "telegram:8745444509", "message_id": "5251", "sender_id": "8745444509", "sender": "🍍",
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:12-15
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "timestamp": "Mon 2026-05-25 06:59 GMT+8", "inbound_event_kind": "user_request"
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:16-17
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: Sender (untrusted metadata):
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:21-21
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "label": "🍍 (8745444509)", "id": "8745444509", "name": "🍍", "username": "gch3n"
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:24-27
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: Conversation context (untrusted, chronological, selected for current message):
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:31-31
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 好，这个看起来不错，做吧 assistant: 好，搭架子。 assistant: 现在把 val-blog 已有的几个 cron（写作发布和前端增强）对应成项目，顺便修一下那个写作 cron 的错误： assistant: 再修一下写作 cron 的 delivery 问题，去掉 announce 避免通知报错噪音：
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:39-42
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: assistant: 完成了。搭的架子如下：
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:43-43
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: **`PROJECTS.md`** — 项目总索引，记录所有有产出的工作和生命周期
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:45-45
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: **`projects/<name>/README.md`** — 每个项目的详情页
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:47-47
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 已创建的第一个项目：`projects/val-blog/README.md`，记录了仓库位置、自动化流程、关键决策。
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:49-49
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 同时把写作 cron 的 delivery 改为 `mode: none`，以后每天 10 点静默写文章并 commit，不会再因为 Telegram 发不出消息而报错。如果你想看每天写没写，可以手动 check，也可以改成每天写完后往 Telegram 发一条简单确认。
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:51-51
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "chat_id": "telegram:8745444509", "message_id": "5259", "sender_id": "8745444509", "sender": "🍍",
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:72-75
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "timestamp": "Mon 2026-05-25 07:11 GMT+8", "inbound_event_kind": "user_request"
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:76-77
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 未来所有session和agent都会遵从这个PROJECTS.md吗？ assistant: 好问题。**直接的答案是：不会自动遵守。**
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:100-101
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: `PROJECTS.md` 和 `projects/` 目录目前在 workspace 里，我（val）会遵守，因为我的 bootstrap 会加载 workspace 文件。但其他 agent（oracle、helix、sentinel 等）有各自的 workspace，不一定读这个。
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:103-103
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 要做成**全系统遵守**，得做两件事：
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:105-105
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: **方案 A：在 agent defaults 里加一个全局指令（推荐）**
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:107-107
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 在 `~/.openclaw/openclaw.json` 的 `agents.defaults` 里加一个 bootstrap hook，让所有 agent 启动时被告知项目规范。
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:109-109
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: **方案 B：在 MEMORY.md 里写一条全局规则**
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:111-111
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 所有 agent 在 bootstrap 时会读到 MEMORY.md（val 的），但其他 agent 读的是自己的 MEMORY.md，不能穿透。
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:113-113
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 两个方案不是互斥的。建议 **A 优先**，我可以在 config 里加一条，结果是这样的：
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:117-117
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 所有 agent 启动时，bootstrap 内容里会包含一条指令，告知项目存放规范。这样无论哪个子 agent 产出文件，都会往 `projects/` 目录下放。
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:119-119
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 要不要我现在改？改完重启 gateway 后所有 agent 都会遵守。 assistant: 好问题。**直接的答案是：不会自动遵守。**
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:121-122
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 要不要我现在改？改完重启 gateway 后所有 agent 都会遵守。 user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:142-143
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "chat_id": "telegram:8745444509", "message_id": "5261", "sender_id": "8745444509", "sender": "🍍",
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:146-149
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "timestamp": "Mon 2026-05-25 07:38 GMT+8", "inbound_event_kind": "user_request"
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:150-151
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 先不考虑其它agents，val的不同对话渠道会遵循PROJECTS.md吗？ assistant: 会。
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:175-176
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 不同渠道（Telegram、微信）的对话本质上都是同一个 val agent 的不同 session，共享同一个 workspace。`PROJECTS.md` 和 `projects/` 目录在 `~/.openclaw/workspace/` 下，所有 val session 启动时都会读到这些文件。
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:178-178
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 所以不管你在 Telegram 还是微信跟我说做项目，产出物都会按规范走。 assistant: 会。
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:180-181
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 所以不管你在 Telegram 还是微信跟我说做项目，产出物都会按规范走。 user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:185-186
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "chat_id": "telegram:8745444509", "message_id": "5263", "sender_id": "8745444509", "sender": "🍍",
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:189-192
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "timestamp": "Mon 2026-05-25 07:39 GMT+8", "inbound_event_kind": "user_request"
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:193-194
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 好，那就先这样，暂时先不考虑其它agents assistant: 明白。先保持现状，有新项目时我按规范走。 assistant: 明白。先保持现状，有新项目时我按规范走。
  - confidence: 0.62
  - evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:219-221
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: User: Conversation context (untrusted, chronological, selected for current message): #5136 Sun 2026-05-24 15:57 GMT+8 🍍: 你看下代码和源端差了多少个commit #5138 Sun 2026-05-24 16:54 GMT+8 🍍: 不用了 #5140 Sun 2026-05-24 17:59 GMT+8 🍍: val #5142 Sun 2026-05-24 18:00 GMT+8 🍍: 微信渠道那边又不能正常回消息了，一直显
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:279-279
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 当前会话：**103k / 1,049k（10%）**。 但你说的首次对话——bootstrap 部分。让我算算初始上下文有多大：
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:280-280
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 首次对话的初始上下文大概是这样构成的： | 组件 | 大小 | |------|------| | **Bootstrap 文件**（SOUL/IDENTITY/USER/MEMORY/AGENTS/TOOLS/HEARTBEAT） | **~14K chars** | | **加上 system prompt**（agents 配置、工具描述、技能、skills） | 估算 ~20-30K | | **再加上 memory search 结果**（如果嵌入启动时做了 recall） | 不定 | | **加上当前用户消息 + 会话
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:281-281
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: User: Conversation context (untrusted, chronological, selected for current message): #5138 Sun 2026-05-24 16:54 GMT+8 🍍: 不用了 #5140 Sun 2026-05-24 17:59 GMT+8 🍍: val #5142 Sun 2026-05-24 18:00 GMT+8 🍍: 微信渠道那边又不能正常回消息了，一直显示在输入 #5156 Sun 2026-05-24 18:09 GMT+8 🍍: 可以了。为什么会出现memor
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:283-283
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: **当前性能：** - 本地 EmbeddingGemma 一次 search：**93ms**（刚测的） - Gemini 之前的情况：被 rate limit 卡住后重试，经常 **60s-300s 级别**的超时 **超时配置** — 之前 Gemini 卡死的原因是 OpenClaw 的 local provider 有超时：
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:284-284
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 汇总一下： **本地 vs Gemini 对比** | 指标 | 本地（EmbeddingGemma） | Gemini（之前） | |------|----------------------|----------------| | 单次 search 耗时 | **~90-150ms** | 正常时 1-3s，限流时 >60s | | 查询超时配置 | **5 分钟**（inlineQueryTimeoutMs） | 同（但实际被限流重试卡死） | | 批量超时 | **10 分钟** | 同 | | 卡死风险 | ✅ **几乎
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:285-285
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: User: Conversation context (untrusted, chronological, selected for current message): #5140 Sun 2026-05-24 17:59 GMT+8 🍍: val #5142 Sun 2026-05-24 18:00 GMT+8 🍍: 微信渠道那边又不能正常回消息了，一直显示在输入 #5156 Sun 2026-05-24 18:09 GMT+8 🍍: 可以了。为什么会出现memory search卡住的问题？有办法避免吗？ #5162 Sun 2026-05-2
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:287-287
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: ✔️ 从卡死 6 分钟降到了 100ms，体验应该会舒服很多。 早点休息，谷老板 🫡
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:288-288
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 开着呢。MBP 的 Tailscale 地址是 `100.105.17.52`（主机名 mbkpro），状态在线。 OpenClaw gateway 的 dashboard 在 `http://100.105.17.52:18789/`，不过你配置了 loopback 绑定 + Tailscale serve，试试看 `https://mbkpro.tail3f1b6.ts.net` 能不能直接访问。
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:290-290
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: User: val,你在微信中的对话风格和其它渠道的是不是不太一样？
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:291-291
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 有点不一样，但不应该差太多。 微信这边因为平台特性限制（消息长度、排版方式等），说话会更短更直一些。但核心的说话方式和判断逻辑是一致的——结论优先、简洁为主、不刷存在感。 你是觉得微信上的我哪里不太对劲？比如语气太正式了，还是太随意了？
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:292-292
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: User: 没什么不对劲的，其实我觉得还蛮好的。你微信渠道的风格设定原话是怎么说的？
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:293-293
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 你说的是 SOUL.md 和 IDENTITY.md 里的那些设定？还是指平台配置里的风格设置？ 目前我没有针对微信渠道单独写"风格设定"，所有渠道共享同一套 SOUL.md / IDENTITY.md / MEMORY.md。你的意思是应该给微信单独写一份风格指南？
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:294-294
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: User: 没有单独指定wechat要怎么说话吗？
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:295-295
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 没有单独指定。 微信渠道跟 Telegram、网页端用的都是同一套 SOUL.md + IDENTITY.md，没有做渠道级别的风格分离。 没觉得有问题的话我就不画蛇添足了。还是说你希望微信上更放松/更正式一点？
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:296-296
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: OpenClaw 配置里没有渠道级别的 style/personality 字段。那换个方式——给微信渠道单独写一份 prompt 覆盖。查一下 OpenClaw 文档看支持什么方式：
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:299-299
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 没有直接渠道级别 prompt 覆盖的配置入口。但是看到了 `multiAgent` 的多 agent 路由功能——我可以给微信路由到一个独立的 agent 实例，用不同的 prompt。 不过更轻量的方式——利用 `channels.<channel>.responsePrefix` 可以做标记，但改不了语气。 最简单有效的方案：**在 bootstraps 里做渠道感知**。给 `openclaw-weixin` 渠道配一个独立的 bootstrap prompt 文件，注入风格指示。 但最轻并且马上能见效的方式，是直接在 `S
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:300-300
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 明白了。最简单的实现方式是给 workspace 里加一个渠道感知的 bootstrap 文件，但那样还是全局的。 不过我突然想到——`val` 这个 agent 的配置文件里可以直接调 prompt。让我看看 val 的 agent config：
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:301-301
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: val 的配置很简单。可以做的方式： **方案 1：创建一个 `WECHAT_STYLE.md` 放到 workspace，在每次微信渠道对话时作为额外 prompt 注入。** 但最好的实现方式，是**利用 bootstrap 注入机制**——给微信对话的上下文里加一条风格指令。不过在不改动基础机制的情况下，最简单直接的方式是： **给 workspace 加一个 `WECHAT_STYLE.md`，然后在 `SOUL.md` 或 bootstraps 里引用，通过渠道感知间接生效。** 或者再轻量一点——我直接在 `SOUL.m
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:302-302
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: User: Write a dream diary entry from these memory fragments: - Conversation Summary: "This response is taking longer than expected" 是**前端/浏览器端的超时提示**，不是后端问题。常见原因： - Conversation Summary: **WebSocket 连接不稳定** - 检查网络或尝试刷新页面; **长响应被前端误判** - 实际后端已返回，前端没收到; **浏览器节流** - 后台标签页会被浏览器降速 - C
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-26.txt:170-170
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: The sky had a shade of blue I can't name — maybe `#6A8BDB` if I were being precise, but it felt softer, like watercolor bleeding across the canvas of the afternoon. I was tracing the edges of a conversation that stretched too long, watching the frontend grow restless a
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-26.txt:171-171
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: like a relay race where nobody dropped the baton.
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-26.txt:172-172
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 嗯，在呢。需要什么？
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-26.txt:173-173
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: User: 给我讲个睡前小故事
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-26.txt:174-174
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 也许那个圈本来就是缺一颗的。
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-27.txt:30-30
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: User: Conversation context (untrusted, chronological, selected for current message): #5276 Tue 2026-05-26 12:14 GMT+8 🍍: Val，昨天的复盘什么也没有吗？ #5279 Tue 2026-05-26 12:15 GMT+8 🍍: 好。今天的blog写了吗？ #5281 Tue 2026-05-26 12:15 GMT+8 🍍: 好 #5284 Wed 2026-05-27 00:09 GMT+8 🍍: val，把今天的blog发给
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-27.txt:36-36
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 本地没有装。不过可以装，我没记错的话 `pip install edge-tts` 就能用，不需要 API key。 是有什么场景要用？比如把这篇 blog 转成语音听听？
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-27.txt:37-37
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 你说得对，先搞清楚场景再动手。 **edge-tts 是什么：** - 微软 Edge 浏览器的在线 TTS 引擎的 Python 封装 - 免费，不需要 API key - 音质很好（自然度接近 ElevenLabs 基础档） - 支持中文（包括多种方言口音）、日文、英文等上百种语言 - 可以调节语速、音量、停顿 **典型使用场景：** 1. **文章/日记转语音** — 比如把这篇 blog 转成语音文件，你通勤时听 2. **实时朗读** — 我写了一段话，直接转语音发到 Telegram 作为 voice message 3
  - confidence: 0.58
  - evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-27.txt:40-40
  - recalls: 0
  - status: staged
