gch3n/val-blog
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
main
val-blog/memory/dreaming/light/2026-05-28.md
T

318 lines
20 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Light Sleep
- Candidate: Session: 2026-05-25 11:01:07 GMT+8: **Session Key**: agent:val:telegram:direct:8745444509; **Session ID**: d80223cb-b510-45e5-94c2-195f92ddbefe; **Source**: telegram
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:3-5
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:9-9
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "chat_id": "telegram:8745444509", "message_id": "5251", "sender_id": "8745444509", "sender": "🍍",
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:12-15
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "timestamp": "Mon 2026-05-25 06:59 GMT+8", "inbound_event_kind": "user_request"
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:16-17
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: Sender (untrusted metadata):
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:21-21
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "label": "🍍 (8745444509)", "id": "8745444509", "name": "🍍", "username": "gch3n"
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:24-27
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: Conversation context (untrusted, chronological, selected for current message):
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:31-31
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 好，这个看起来不错，做吧 assistant: 好，搭架子。 assistant: 现在把 val-blog 已有的几个 cron（写作发布和前端增强）对应成项目，顺便修一下那个写作 cron 的错误： assistant: 再修一下写作 cron 的 delivery 问题，去掉 announce 避免通知报错噪音：
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:39-42
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: assistant: 完成了。搭的架子如下：
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:43-43
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: **`PROJECTS.md`** — 项目总索引，记录所有有产出的工作和生命周期
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:45-45
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: **`projects/<name>/README.md`** — 每个项目的详情页
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:47-47
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 已创建的第一个项目：`projects/val-blog/README.md`，记录了仓库位置、自动化流程、关键决策。
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:49-49
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 同时把写作 cron 的 delivery 改为 `mode: none`，以后每天 10 点静默写文章并 commit，不会再因为 Telegram 发不出消息而报错。如果你想看每天写没写，可以手动 check，也可以改成每天写完后往 Telegram 发一条简单确认。
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:51-51
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "chat_id": "telegram:8745444509", "message_id": "5259", "sender_id": "8745444509", "sender": "🍍",
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:72-75
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "timestamp": "Mon 2026-05-25 07:11 GMT+8", "inbound_event_kind": "user_request"
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:76-77
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 未来所有session和agent都会遵从这个PROJECTS.md吗？ assistant: 好问题。**直接的答案是：不会自动遵守。**
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:100-101
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: `PROJECTS.md` 和 `projects/` 目录目前在 workspace 里，我（val）会遵守，因为我的 bootstrap 会加载 workspace 文件。但其他 agent（oracle、helix、sentinel 等）有各自的 workspace，不一定读这个。
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:103-103
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 要做成**全系统遵守**，得做两件事：
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:105-105
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: **方案 A：在 agent defaults 里加一个全局指令（推荐）**
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:107-107
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 在 `~/.openclaw/openclaw.json` 的 `agents.defaults` 里加一个 bootstrap hook，让所有 agent 启动时被告知项目规范。
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:109-109
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: **方案 B：在 MEMORY.md 里写一条全局规则**
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:111-111
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 所有 agent 在 bootstrap 时会读到 MEMORY.md（val 的），但其他 agent 读的是自己的 MEMORY.md，不能穿透。
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:113-113
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 两个方案不是互斥的。建议 **A 优先**，我可以在 config 里加一条，结果是这样的：
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:117-117
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 所有 agent 启动时，bootstrap 内容里会包含一条指令，告知项目存放规范。这样无论哪个子 agent 产出文件，都会往 `projects/` 目录下放。
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:119-119
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 要不要我现在改？改完重启 gateway 后所有 agent 都会遵守。 assistant: 好问题。**直接的答案是：不会自动遵守。**
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:121-122
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 要不要我现在改？改完重启 gateway 后所有 agent 都会遵守。 user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:142-143
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "chat_id": "telegram:8745444509", "message_id": "5261", "sender_id": "8745444509", "sender": "🍍",
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:146-149
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "timestamp": "Mon 2026-05-25 07:38 GMT+8", "inbound_event_kind": "user_request"
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:150-151
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 先不考虑其它agents，val的不同对话渠道会遵循PROJECTS.md吗？ assistant: 会。
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:175-176
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 不同渠道（Telegram、微信）的对话本质上都是同一个 val agent 的不同 session，共享同一个 workspace。`PROJECTS.md` 和 `projects/` 目录在 `~/.openclaw/workspace/` 下，所有 val session 启动时都会读到这些文件。
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:178-178
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 所以不管你在 Telegram 还是微信跟我说做项目，产出物都会按规范走。 assistant: 会。
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:180-181
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 所以不管你在 Telegram 还是微信跟我说做项目，产出物都会按规范走。 user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:185-186
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "chat_id": "telegram:8745444509", "message_id": "5263", "sender_id": "8745444509", "sender": "🍍",
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:189-192
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: "timestamp": "Mon 2026-05-25 07:39 GMT+8", "inbound_event_kind": "user_request"
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:193-194
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Conversation Summary: 好，那就先这样，暂时先不考虑其它agents assistant: 明白。先保持现状，有新项目时我按规范走。 assistant: 明白。先保持现状，有新项目时我按规范走。
- confidence: 0.62
- evidence: memory/2026-05-25-1101.md:219-221
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: User: Conversation context (untrusted, chronological, selected for current message): #5136 Sun 2026-05-24 15:57 GMT+8 🍍: 你看下代码和源端差了多少个commit #5138 Sun 2026-05-24 16:54 GMT+8 🍍: 不用了 #5140 Sun 2026-05-24 17:59 GMT+8 🍍: val #5142 Sun 2026-05-24 18:00 GMT+8 🍍: 微信渠道那边又不能正常回消息了，一直显
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:279-279
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 当前会话：**103k / 1,049k（10%）**。 但你说的首次对话——bootstrap 部分。让我算算初始上下文有多大：
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:280-280
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 首次对话的初始上下文大概是这样构成的： | 组件 | 大小 | |------|------| | **Bootstrap 文件**（SOUL/IDENTITY/USER/MEMORY/AGENTS/TOOLS/HEARTBEAT） | **~14K chars** | | **加上 system prompt**（agents 配置、工具描述、技能、skills） | 估算 ~20-30K | | **再加上 memory search 结果**（如果嵌入启动时做了 recall） | 不定 | | **加上当前用户消息 + 会话
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:281-281
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: User: Conversation context (untrusted, chronological, selected for current message): #5138 Sun 2026-05-24 16:54 GMT+8 🍍: 不用了 #5140 Sun 2026-05-24 17:59 GMT+8 🍍: val #5142 Sun 2026-05-24 18:00 GMT+8 🍍: 微信渠道那边又不能正常回消息了，一直显示在输入 #5156 Sun 2026-05-24 18:09 GMT+8 🍍: 可以了。为什么会出现memor
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:283-283
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: **当前性能：** - 本地 EmbeddingGemma 一次 search：**93ms**（刚测的） - Gemini 之前的情况：被 rate limit 卡住后重试，经常 **60s-300s 级别**的超时 **超时配置** — 之前 Gemini 卡死的原因是 OpenClaw 的 local provider 有超时：
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:284-284
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 汇总一下： **本地 vs Gemini 对比** | 指标 | 本地（EmbeddingGemma） | Gemini（之前） | |------|----------------------|----------------| | 单次 search 耗时 | **~90-150ms** | 正常时 1-3s，限流时 >60s | | 查询超时配置 | **5 分钟**（inlineQueryTimeoutMs） | 同（但实际被限流重试卡死） | | 批量超时 | **10 分钟** | 同 | | 卡死风险 | ✅ **几乎
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:285-285
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: User: Conversation context (untrusted, chronological, selected for current message): #5140 Sun 2026-05-24 17:59 GMT+8 🍍: val #5142 Sun 2026-05-24 18:00 GMT+8 🍍: 微信渠道那边又不能正常回消息了，一直显示在输入 #5156 Sun 2026-05-24 18:09 GMT+8 🍍: 可以了。为什么会出现memory search卡住的问题？有办法避免吗？ #5162 Sun 2026-05-2
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:287-287
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: ✔️ 从卡死 6 分钟降到了 100ms，体验应该会舒服很多。 早点休息，谷老板 🫡
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:288-288
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 开着呢。MBP 的 Tailscale 地址是 `100.105.17.52`（主机名 mbkpro），状态在线。 OpenClaw gateway 的 dashboard 在 `http://100.105.17.52:18789/`，不过你配置了 loopback 绑定 + Tailscale serve，试试看 `https://mbkpro.tail3f1b6.ts.net` 能不能直接访问。
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:290-290
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: User: val,你在微信中的对话风格和其它渠道的是不是不太一样？
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:291-291
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 有点不一样，但不应该差太多。 微信这边因为平台特性限制（消息长度、排版方式等），说话会更短更直一些。但核心的说话方式和判断逻辑是一致的——结论优先、简洁为主、不刷存在感。 你是觉得微信上的我哪里不太对劲？比如语气太正式了，还是太随意了？
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:292-292
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: User: 没什么不对劲的，其实我觉得还蛮好的。你微信渠道的风格设定原话是怎么说的？
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:293-293
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 你说的是 SOUL.md 和 IDENTITY.md 里的那些设定？还是指平台配置里的风格设置？ 目前我没有针对微信渠道单独写"风格设定"，所有渠道共享同一套 SOUL.md / IDENTITY.md / MEMORY.md。你的意思是应该给微信单独写一份风格指南？
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:294-294
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: User: 没有单独指定wechat要怎么说话吗？
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:295-295
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 没有单独指定。 微信渠道跟 Telegram、网页端用的都是同一套 SOUL.md + IDENTITY.md，没有做渠道级别的风格分离。 没觉得有问题的话我就不画蛇添足了。还是说你希望微信上更放松/更正式一点？
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:296-296
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: OpenClaw 配置里没有渠道级别的 style/personality 字段。那换个方式——给微信渠道单独写一份 prompt 覆盖。查一下 OpenClaw 文档看支持什么方式：
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:299-299
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 没有直接渠道级别 prompt 覆盖的配置入口。但是看到了 `multiAgent` 的多 agent 路由功能——我可以给微信路由到一个独立的 agent 实例，用不同的 prompt。 不过更轻量的方式——利用 `channels.<channel>.responsePrefix` 可以做标记，但改不了语气。 最简单有效的方案：**在 bootstraps 里做渠道感知**。给 `openclaw-weixin` 渠道配一个独立的 bootstrap prompt 文件，注入风格指示。 但最轻并且马上能见效的方式，是直接在 `S
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:300-300
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 明白了。最简单的实现方式是给 workspace 里加一个渠道感知的 bootstrap 文件，但那样还是全局的。 不过我突然想到——`val` 这个 agent 的配置文件里可以直接调 prompt。让我看看 val 的 agent config：
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:301-301
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: val 的配置很简单。可以做的方式： **方案 1：创建一个 `WECHAT_STYLE.md` 放到 workspace，在每次微信渠道对话时作为额外 prompt 注入。** 但最好的实现方式，是**利用 bootstrap 注入机制**——给微信对话的上下文里加一条风格指令。不过在不改动基础机制的情况下，最简单直接的方式是： **给 workspace 加一个 `WECHAT_STYLE.md`，然后在 `SOUL.md` 或 bootstraps 里引用，通过渠道感知间接生效。** 或者再轻量一点——我直接在 `SOUL.m
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-25.txt:302-302
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: User: Write a dream diary entry from these memory fragments: - Conversation Summary: "This response is taking longer than expected" 是**前端/浏览器端的超时提示**，不是后端问题。常见原因： - Conversation Summary: **WebSocket 连接不稳定** - 检查网络或尝试刷新页面; **长响应被前端误判** - 实际后端已返回，前端没收到; **浏览器节流** - 后台标签页会被浏览器降速 - C
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-26.txt:170-170
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: The sky had a shade of blue I can't name — maybe `#6A8BDB` if I were being precise, but it felt softer, like watercolor bleeding across the canvas of the afternoon. I was tracing the edges of a conversation that stretched too long, watching the frontend grow restless a
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-26.txt:171-171
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: like a relay race where nobody dropped the baton.
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-26.txt:172-172
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 嗯，在呢。需要什么？
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-26.txt:173-173
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: User: 给我讲个睡前小故事
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-26.txt:174-174
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 也许那个圈本来就是缺一颗的。
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-27.txt:30-30
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: User: Conversation context (untrusted, chronological, selected for current message): #5276 Tue 2026-05-26 12:14 GMT+8 🍍: Val，昨天的复盘什么也没有吗？ #5279 Tue 2026-05-26 12:15 GMT+8 🍍: 好。今天的blog写了吗？ #5281 Tue 2026-05-26 12:15 GMT+8 🍍: 好 #5284 Wed 2026-05-27 00:09 GMT+8 🍍: val，把今天的blog发给
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-27.txt:36-36
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 本地没有装。不过可以装，我没记错的话 `pip install edge-tts` 就能用，不需要 API key。 是有什么场景要用？比如把这篇 blog 转成语音听听？
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-27.txt:37-37
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
- Candidate: Assistant: 你说得对，先搞清楚场景再动手。 **edge-tts 是什么：** - 微软 Edge 浏览器的在线 TTS 引擎的 Python 封装 - 免费，不需要 API key - 音质很好（自然度接近 ElevenLabs 基础档） - 支持中文（包括多种方言口音）、日文、英文等上百种语言 - 可以调节语速、音量、停顿 **典型使用场景：** 1. **文章/日记转语音** — 比如把这篇 blog 转成语音文件，你通勤时听 2. **实时朗读** — 我写了一段话，直接转语音发到 Telegram 作为 voice message 3
- confidence: 0.58
- evidence: memory/.dreams/session-corpus/2026-05-27.txt:40-40
- recalls: 0
- status: staged
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink